Gun Control?:

"Gun Control?" This notion has been brought up by Obama and the left, right after Americas most deadly mass shooting. When in reality the question should be "Islam Reformation?". For this shooting wasn't committed on the basis that he saw his gun one day and said "hey I think ill go kill some innocent people!". This act of radical Islamic terrorism was committed by a man of whom pledged allegiance to ISIS/ ISIL, and then went on to slaughter innocent people of the LGBTQ community in an act of Islamic Jihadism. All the while Muslims everywhere say "oh, that's not the real Islam!". If this is not "Real Islam" then why aren't Muslims fighting back against this threat, why aren't people in America and the Middle East signing up to fight against something they see damaging to their faith? The reason why they are not doing so is for one of two reasons, you decide which one you believe; 1.) they are scared for their own lives (even though Islam rewards martyrs), or 2.) they actually silently believe in the type of Islam being used and are just saying its not "Real Islam" so that they can stay in the country. If Muslims actually believe that this type of Islamic Jihadism is a false representation of their religion then they should stand up and actually fight for it to be destroyed. Now we will move on to the main topic "Gun Control".

Many Senators, Congressmen, Presidents (Obama), and many civilians are calling for more strict gun control laws after this recent attack, and this is where I actually admit the Democrats have a point. The Democrats say that they do not wish to ban certain gun types, as of now they wish to make it illegal for convicted felons, people of whom are on the U.S. terror watch list and people on the U.S. no fly list to be banned from purchasing firearms. This law makes total and complete logical sense for why would any felon, potential terrorist, or someone of whom is banned from flying be allowed to buy a firearm? Some say that he may be placed there on accident and its not right to take his 2nd amendment right away because of a mistake, however would you rather gamble up to now 50 lives on the prospect that they may not use the gun for violence? The logical answer is no, therefore this legislation is a more moderate form of legislation. For it doesn't remove types of guns from public arms, and it doesn't bar law abiding citizens from owning a gun, what it does do, is it makes it vastly harder for a potential terrorist to buy a gun. However this issue should not be brought up in light of a horrendous terrorist attack as a way to push the liberal agenda forward, instead they should have given it a week or two then attempted to pass legislation.